April 23rd, 2009
‘clobber’ ensures that the register is free before entering and after exiting an instruction. Therefore you can’t use it to say a register is used then destoryed by an instruction such as LOADACC, (X+) on X.
Took a while to figure this out
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
April 16th, 2009
GCC is crazy. It recognises a printf(’foo\n’) and turns it into the equivalent puts(’foo’) instead.
builtins.c has all types of similar transformations including printf(’%c’, v) to a putch(v) and printf(’%s’, v) to fputs().
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
April 4th, 2009
The Cii seems interesting. It needs more publicity - this is the first time I’ve heard of it in my fifteen years in Christchurch.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
March 29th, 2009
For bfd, add them to the comment block in reloc.c then run ‘make headers’. One more make after that gets it through to bfd.h
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
March 1st, 2009
So the BFD architectures listed in bfd.h are actually defined archures.c in a big comment block at the start of the file. This is split out and fired into the documentation, many bfd-in-xx.h files, and finally into bfd.h.
Note that a ‘make headers’ doesn’t re-build it. I found a ‘make distclean; ./configure’ was the most brute force way.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
February 18th, 2009
I like Python. I want to use Python everywhere. Hmm. Sounds more like an addiction. The question is, is Python suitable as a glue language on a embedded Linux system?
With a few hacks Python 1.5.2 cross compiles just fine. The speed will be acceptable so it’s really only the size that matters.
A standard build under x86 is 12.6M. From there:
- Stripping python saves 1.1M
- Removing man and include saves 400k
- Removing *.py and *.pyo saves 2.8M but still lets everything run
- Removing Tk, Config, and stdwin saves 3.9M
- Removing test saves 1.9M
This brings a fully working Python interpreter with all of the command line libraries down to 2.4M. Quite respectable.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
February 1st, 2009
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
November 25th, 2008
http://www.ladyada.net/make/fuzebox/index.html
and
http://www.makershed.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=MKPO1
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
September 29th, 2008
…fish grotto on the bay in San Diego is very good.
They also do seafood.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »
August 15th, 2008
Saw RMS at Canterbury University today. He has an interesting point of view, very liberal, but also a point of view that is based on old technology.
He said that sites like Google Docs are a problem as you are running a program on their machine, a program that you don’t have control over. The solution is to install your own version on your own machine. I wonder how you can do this and still get the advantages of hosted software, such as lower cost, lower administration, and higher availability. I don’t want to manage any of the software I use, and one solution is to let someone else do it.
He’s not concerned about embedded systems where a processor is used instead of a dedicated circuit, such as in a microwave. However, my microwave gains time and I’d rather have it show time in 24 hours to match the stove. Both I could fix with the source. Then you have car computers such as the Nissan GT-R that changes the car response if it is on a race track. I heard a rumor of the NSX requiring you to take the car to the dealer if it goes anywhere near a known track.
Hmm. Perhaps the embedded/mechanical equivalent is the Maker Bill of Rights from Make Magazine.
Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »